Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2015, 4:58 am
(c) Permit Required. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Argument [I.] [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
§355(j)(5)(C)(ii)(I). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
See Tronzo v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:45 pm
C. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
Last September, the Third Circuit ruled in FCC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 10:21 am
., S.A. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
The Tribunal held, contrary to the council’s contention in that case, that the periodic tenancies were “a continuation of the original agreement and not three separate and different agreements and it therefore followed that the tenant had a material interest …” This was in reliance on a Valuation Tribunal decision in Oyston v Leeds City Council (27 July 2011) [Which I think is this one] However, the Upper Tribunal preferred the argument in found in a… [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
I post it both because it's a terrific set of readings that should be of interest to many here, and because Prof. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
Continue reading to see the decision. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
R. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
Besides yesterday's Opinion of AG Wathelet, another recent example that comes to mind is the Opinion of AG Szpunar in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15 [the 'e-lending case', currently in progress and noted here], in which he clearly stated [para 34] that "the principal objective of copyright is to safeguard the interests of authors".Secondly, should the CJEU follow the Opinion of AG… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 10:22 am
On Sept. 25, 2019, in Logan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
R. 4-6.c. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:59 pm
” The letter goes on to indicate that “in coordination with” the Securities and Exchange Commission, FINRA will “consider how firms determine whether a particular digital asset is a security” and whether the firms have adequate controls and supervision over compliance with rules related to the (i) marketing, (ii) sale, (iii) execution, (iv) control, (v) clearance, (vi) recordkeeping, and (vii) valuation of digital assets. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
See FindWhat Inv’r Grp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
By Glen C. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
