Search for: "Russell, Appeal of" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm by Andrew Hamm
House of Hope Recovery 21-1211Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 permits a court of appeals to dismiss an appeal because the appellant did not serve the notice of appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Hungary v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:55 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed the ruling in favor of Unicolors, leading to this appeal. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am by Amy Howe
Idaho (Oct. 30) – When an inmate waives his right to appeal and then argues that his trial counsel was constitutionally inadequate because he failed to appeal, despite the inmate’s request, should courts assume that the inmate was prejudiced by his lawyer’s failure to appeal, or must the inmate actually show that he was prejudiced by indicating what issues he would have raised had he appealed? [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Appeal, Jay Willis calls Barton v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
The city of Newport Beach, California, had appealed a decision by the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 8:16 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to first issue a final ruling in the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel for Google in Google v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Missouri 19-967Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]