Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in this case.] [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Bank of America, N.A. 13-1416Issue: Whether an order denying confirmation of a bankruptcy plan is appealable. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in M&G Polymers.] [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
The developing story of the FBI’s impersonation of journalists is, in a way, really the story of Timberline high school in Washington State. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
That seems sensible enough, and the kind of thing likely to appeal to the Justices. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:35 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:35 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit does with a case it is now reviewing en banc. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 6:17 pm
As the Ontario Court of Appeal observed in Wynberg v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
When the smoke cleared after numerous motions and appeals, what remained was a Section 11 claim based on the 2005 offering. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Patel.] [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
(Here, for example, are Radley Balko, Damon Root, Tony Mauro, and Russell Berman, as well as skeptical posts from Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
Ayala, in which it added an additional question: whether the court of appeals properly applied the standard articulated in Brecht v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Russell and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) (although neither authority expressly addresses cross-appeals). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
