Search for: "SEC v. Downe" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Michael Dreeben
The Court started down this counterintuitive path in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Despite the 92-page complaint, the case boils down to a simple proposition. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Scandals United States District Court Judge Sam Kent was sentenced to 33 months in jail for lying to investigators  A securities lawyer made a “noisy withdrawal” to the SEC shortly before the SEC shut down Stanford Financial Group. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Because current practice is for ALJs to be appointed by SEC staff rather than by the commission, a holding that they are officers would invalidate actions they had taken in the past. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
In his concurring opinion to the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion, handed down on Feb. 15, 2018 Chief Judge Roger Gregory answers this question in the negative. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
Securities fraud in the secondary market:  '34 Act Section 10(b); SEC Rule 10b-5.Elements:Scienter. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
JD exists over claims based on pending sec. fraud case. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Parmalat-SDNY-Kaplan-8-31-11.pdf … SDNY: No mand. abstention vs GT per §1334(c)(2) bec case can't be timely adjudicated in IL "at the present time". http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Parmalat-SDNY-Kap [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
  Indeed, in the seminal case of Batson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]