Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! " Results 1221 - 1240 of 9,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Eric Goldman
  But as record and CD sales dried up, and streaming became the primary means of making money, the disparate treatment of pre-1972 sound recordings (which were earning nothing) and 1972-and-later sound recordings (which at least got streaming revenue from digital audio transmissions) became too obvious for performers and record labels to ignore. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:00 am by Jaclyn Ford
California Court Ruling on Employee Seating Requirements Earlier this year, the California Supreme Court issued a decision on a class action case that involved an employer who forced its employees to stand during their work and subjected those employees to potential discipline for sitting down. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 5:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, the need for various entities to supply data to allow reporting companies to comply with disclosure requirements will create strains up and down the “value chain. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 9:48 am by Ilya Somin
Even if the standing decision stands up on appeal, it is unlikely to prevent judicial review of Trump's wall-building plan, because there are many other lawsuits against it brought by parties who clearly do have standing, even if the House does not. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:59 pm
... and not one State's attempt to jack-up the tax on it -- or says Orin Kerr of The Volokh Conspiracy here. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:53 am by Altman & Altman
In misdemeanor cases, an out of state client may hire an attorney to stand in for court proceedings. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:34 pm by Corrie Buck and Mara Curtis
The California Courts denied that motion, holding that categorical waivers of PAGA standing are contrary to California policy and that PAGA claims cannot be split into arbitrable “individual” claims and nonarbitrable “representative” claims. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:24 pm by David Jensen
 Newsom's endorsement was buried in a news release announcing his stand on a number of ballot measures. [read post]
It does this by “deputizing” private attorneys to file lawsuits on behalf of employees who, in concept, stand in the shoes of the state. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm by John Lewis and Carrie Valdez
” Leading up to this week’s decision, at least six California district court decisions rejected the Iskanian rule as preempted by the FAA and enforced an employee’s right to waive his or her ability to pursue a representative PAGA claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
Last February, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, Michael Oren, went to the University of California at Irvine to speak. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
” In the California Lawyer, Douglas Kmiec looks back at the October Term 2013, concluding that “[t]his was in some ways a more important term for the practical application and explanation of precedent as informed by historical practice. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
If you have (or know of) a recent article or post that you would like to have included in the round-up, please send a link to roundup [at] scotusblog.com so that we can consider it. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
  The San Bernadino Sun writes that the only alternative to releasing prisoners is to “float a massive construction bond the state can’t afford and begin putting up more prisons. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
California, one of the cellphone privacy cases, at the cert. stage but is not involved at the merits. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:59 am by Sam Ritchie, ACLU
LGBT students are far too often forced to stand up for themselves in the face of discrimination. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  In that case, the Court will consider the constitutionality of a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]