Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am
Vijay Tharwani v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors,… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of… [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
(IP Solutions) Global – Patents Why being an independent inventor is like dating (IP Asset Maximiser) IP protection no barrier to green technology transfer (IP Watch) Global - Copyright Bill Patry’s response to Tom Syndor’s book ‘review’ (Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars) Africa Are copycat businesses best fought on dilution grounds (Afro-IP) Supreme Court of Appeal handed down its decision – Mr Video… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
Read the statement from Professor Barbara van Schewick (professor of law at Stanford University and the director of Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society) who testified at every hearing on the bill, and filed two amicus briefs on the key issues in the case, here. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
Abbott, Florida State University College of Law John A. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
The cases in which the Court granted cert. this morning are: Title: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The Court’s ruling yesterday in McGirt v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:42 pm
The decision is in Rosen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm
But I think that's not right as a matter of Free Exercise Clause precedent, which (at least as the Court interpreted it in Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
Babies and children lack legal capacity—and rely on the care of parents, guardians, or the state to survive. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm
”Youngblood v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
