Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 3:39 am
” --Associate Justice Antonin Scalia in City of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:37 am
Here is one excerpt of his analysis: In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
United States and its immediate precursor, Panama Ref. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:51 am
Oral arguments in Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm
Gorsuch to fill the late Antonin Scalia's seat on the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
United States, Judge Reed O'Connor found that the entire Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:07 am
The first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:54 am
Dissecting Bilski: The Meaning of the Supreme Patent DecisionWho knows what goes through the minds of anyone, let alone a cloistered Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:01 pm
Alito wrote a concurring opinion arguing that the statute requires the government to prove only that the defendant knowingly sought to obtain money by means of a falsehood and not for any specific purpose.As I said in my entry last week on the defendant's loss in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 11:18 am
United States (here) cites articles from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the DuPage County Register. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:10 am
J. 677 (2007).Subsidiarity and Religious Establishments in the United States Constitution, 52 Vill. [read post]
