Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 1221 - 1240 of 10,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 7:15 am
Universal WHEN: Tuesday, July 7 9 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit James R. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:59 am by Jason M. Halper
On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court handed down two decisions that may, in practice, limit the ability to access federal district courts. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Those who lived in the United States in 1792 surely had views on such mat- ters. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
To be sure, it is very easy to over-read a three-sentence opinion issued in a very short period of time on a motion for a stay. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Government’s argument: No one seemed all that happy with the United States’ official immunit [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:38 pm
We are not called to decide whether Goulart is a good person, but rather whether a person who has been banished from the United States without legal justification should be permitted to seek to return. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:15 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
A decision last week out of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692 (1946), the United States Supreme Court held, "it is only when an employee is required to give up a substantial measure of his time and effort that compensable working time (which is covered by the FLSA) is involved" In Lindow v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:26 am
On April 30, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in The Robare Group, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]