Search for: "State v. Allen" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
” US v Brandon Lee Price – Federal Criminal Complaint US v Brandon Lee Price – Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:44 pm by Will Aitchison
And so it was for the defendants in Thompson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
Kristie Urban, No. 98,856 (Johnson)State appeal (petition for review)Janine CoxSufficiency of evidence for agg escape from custody chargeState v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
®  In State v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Google agreed to pay nearly $1.4 billion to the state of Texas to settle allegations of violating the data privacy rights of state residents. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
 In a footnote, the court in Hoskins stated ” Federal law preempts the authority of state courts to consider veterans’ disability benefits as property divisible upon termination of a marriage (citing Mansell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Allen The Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:30 am
District Judge Allen Sharp ruled in favor of Indiana Right to Life, saying the state's code of conduct for judges was unconstitutional because it broadly forbade judicial candidates from stating their views on legal issues. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]