Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Counting last week’s Cawthorn ruling, Section 3 challenges have now generated two state and three federal judicial rulings—the first opinions on Section 3 in a century and a half. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
The post Court holds disparate fees in business bankruptcy cases unconstitutional appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm
That case is pending in Hawaii state court. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm
" (United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
Supreme Court held in Nestlé v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
(And that judicial review under state constitutions predated the federal Constitution.) [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:55 am
The Supreme Court also specifically clarified the first prong of § 1400(b) by holding that a corporate defendant can only “reside” in its incorporation state. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
District court opinion enjoining the law. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
Meanwhile, further down the judicial corridor, Holman J took a different view. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm
”A statement issued by the Innocence Project following the Shinn ruling agreed with Sotomayor and noted that the Court “set aside the judgments of four federal judges—on both the federal district court and the federal court of appeals—that Barry Jones was represented by a trial attorney whose failure to investigate and challenge the prosecution evidence caused Mr. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court has long held, in First Amendment religion-clause cases, that it’s inappropriate for a jury to determine “the truth or falsity of . . . religious beliefs or doctrines,” United States v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(Citing North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Two First Amendment theories Per the court’s opinion, “Plaintiffs advance two theories under the First Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm
On May 25, 2022, the League of California Cities (“League”) and California State Association of Counties (“CSAC”) filed a 10-page letter with the California Supreme Court requesting it to depublish the First District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
” “Readily distinguishable” is judicial-speak for “not even close. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
”And then there is this remarkable judicial decision (from the Western District of Washington, revising a footnote from a previous decision of the court) that discussed the D.C. [read post]
