Search for: "State v. Gaines"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 9,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
In the landmark decision of Obergfell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:04 pm
EDO asserted that the alleged wrongful acts of Glynn and his company allowed them to "gain a head start" in developing and producing products, resulted in benefits such as profits, earnings, patent royalties, and commissions. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 9:08 pm
At the government's request, the Sixth Circuit has published its previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 11:39 am
The insurer urged the court to follow Judge Posner’s 2001 opinion in the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Level 3 Communications v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:15 pm
When the original 13 states became sovereign, they gained absolute right to all navigable rivers and the lands beneath them for public use. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Caglayan Orge Saylan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:16 pm
Videoshare, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
In Wilgus v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 9:49 pm
Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:54 am
For example, the justices split quite vocally over this question in Ramos v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
A provision of state eminent domain law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12-4(a) gives towns authority to condemn and obtain ownership of property in other municipalities, and Cliffside Park is claiming that right in its complaint, Borough of Cliffside Park v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:11 pm
In Fresenius Medical Care v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are insufficient for… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am
Lemmon v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court released its opinion in Teva v. [read post]
