Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
All the expenses listed by the Appellant should have been considered, and the reviewing officer failed to provide reasons for disallowing each item. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
He has previously interned with the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and volunteered with International Justice Mission advocating for property rights of widows in rural Uganda. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
WHREN v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
This is because, under carryover basis, any appreciation in the property’s value from the time the donor acquired the property to the time the donor transferred the property to the recipient is taxable. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 11:52 am
Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:55 pm
Brinegar v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:50 pm
Louis Art Museum (SLAM) oppose reopening the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
The state must also produce all evidence that is in their possession that may help your defense under Brady v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
Claims of this kind are not infrequent in your state or in other states, where Community Property prevails, and it is seldom that we have a case where it is not determined that some part of the proceeds should go to the spouse. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:33 am
US Attorney Richard Callahan responded on March 16 by initiating a lawsuit against the mummy mask.In a complaint titled United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:32 am
On December 21, 2016, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:32 am
On December 21, 2016, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:34 am
As an example, the New Jersey Supreme Court held the State EPA did not need a warrant before inspecting a property that was subject to the terms of a wetland permit. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
In Reed v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:52 am
Read the entire opinion here:U.S. v Woods, 517 U.S. __, No. 12-562 (Dec. 3. 2013). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm
., 701 F.3d 1031 (5th Cir. 2012); Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
