Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
He stated that refusal to permit disclosure to the ECtHR does not constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
One such case is Generics [UK] Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Yeda Research And Development Co Ltd and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 925, decided yesterday by a three-man Court of Appeal for England and Wales which consisted of two specialist IP judges -- Lords Justices Kitchin and Floyd -- together with Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
The bill broke with tradition in Britain and the empire, as it included provisions from the bill of rights of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
The panel was comprised of Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
First Division, Inner House, Court of Session Lord Carloway (President), Lord Menzies and Lady Clark of Calton refused the appeals. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
But a claimant in a defamation or malicious falsehood claim who obtained permission to serve out of the jurisdiction had to limit the claim to alleged publications within England and Wales – a principle re-stated by the House of Lords in Berezovsky v Forbes Inc (No.1) ([2000] 1 WLR 1004) Mr Huda’s only potentially viable cause of action was the publication of the report to the GOC -he had no real prospect of establishing publication to… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Central to the case was whether the House of Lords decision in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5 covered the issue and whether Runa Begum should be viewed differently in the light of Tsfayo. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:04 am
In the case of obviousness in view of the state of the art, a key question is generally “what problem was the patentee trying to solve? [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
Supreme Court judgment In a judgment delivered by Lord Hughes, the Supreme Court unanimously refused Mr Nunn’s appeal. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
“The People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Before Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson, judgment was handed down in the case of the Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water Plc, [2014] UKSC 40 on 2nd July 2014. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am
She said The digitisation of the processes will follow as soon as possible for the existing contracts, provided that the Lord Chancellor’s court assessment suggests that the system can cope. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
