Search for: "State v. Major"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 45,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2020, 9:18 am
In Barr v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Briscoe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
Whether the actions by the majority of the State Legislature along with the State Board of Higher Education can be separated because the two entities acted in concert to promulgate SB 2370. 5. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 4:19 pm
In State of Delaware v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:51 am
A recent decision by the court of appeals in State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm
Here's the beginning of this detailed account: At oral argument in the Texas state prisoner’s federal habeas case Gonzalez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
In a 4-1 majority opinion written by Associate Chief Justice John A. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 10:50 am
The majority answers narrowly, stating that New Mexico is regulating Indian gaming only when the regulation is directly applied to Indian gaming on tribal land. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In States of Tennessee et. al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
United States (D. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 1:17 pm
McCann v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
In this post, we summarize a portion of the majority judgement.Case: AT & T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am
The Supreme Court will conclude its oral arguments for the current Term with the major case on a state’s power to pass laws to control undocumented immigrants living in the state — Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
See also Gay v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
”) State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Today, we’re doing something a little different, taking our cue from a recent New York state appellate decision: Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:58 pm
As Blawgletter reads it, the decision comes down to the majority's conclusion that the state's interest in preserving the health of a pre-viability fetus outweighs the woman's interest in preserving her own health. [read post]
