Search for: "State v. Murphy" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was not… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]