Search for: "State v. Nelson " Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38), we find that the complaint sufficiently stated distinct causes of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli recorded an incorrect sale price on certain tax documents, exposing PSSI to higher taxes (see Randazzo v Nelson, 128 AD3d 935, 937). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:54 am by Unknown
The amici stated that the SEC’s claim that the Fifth Circuit was incorrect in holding that the SEC’s administrative proceedings violate the Seventh Amendment’s guarantee of a jury trial is undercut by the SEC’s positions in previous cases.They cited SEC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:27 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Plaintiffs’ Mother and Wife Died after Being Admitted to Hospital with Intestinal Hernia The plaintiffs in the case of Nelson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Since an attorney-client relationship does not depend on the existence of a formal retainer agreement or upon payment of a fee, a court must look to the words and actions of the parties to ascertain the existence of such a relationship” (Nelson v Kalathara, 48 AD3d 528, 529 [2d Dept 2008] [citation omitted]; see also Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 NY2d 62, 71 [1980] [payment of fee by third party does not create attorney-client relationship between attorney… [read post]