Search for: "State v. Primes" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Belize The case brought against Ramon “Munchi” Cervantes, Jr., and Fiesta FM by Deputy Prime Minister Hon. [read post]
Notably, the Court went further and stated that it disapproves of a string of cases on which the court of appeals relied—Mattison v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:28 am by Bruce Zagaris
On April 9, 2018, Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich announced that the Russian Government would support the companies that fell under U.S. sanctions.[9] According to the press-secretary of the Head of state Dmitry Peskov, Russian President Vladimir Putin does not plan to meet with oligarchs who are put on the U.S. sanctions list. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:28 am by Bruce Zagaris
On April 9, 2018, Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich announced that the Russian Government would support the companies that fell under U.S. sanctions.[9] According to the press-secretary of the Head of state Dmitry Peskov, Russian President Vladimir Putin does not plan to meet with oligarchs who are put on the U.S. sanctions list. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:55 pm
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its decision in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 5:35 am by Fiona Folkson
[v] The Bill could therefore be introduced as soon as May 2022, although much of the detail is yet to be revealed. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 4:53 pm by Guest Author
The FCC’s long running “net neutrality” saga is certainly a prime example. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]