Search for: "State v. R. E. J" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(e) in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] 3 WLR 636, the House of Lords had concluded that, in order to raise an exceptional defence of the sort contemplated in Kay, the defendant would have to show that the decision to seek possession was Wednesbury unreasonable. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The story of how Indigenous peoples were included within the state could be avoided with bland statements—such as, “there was from the outset never any doubt that sovereignty and legislative power, and indeed the underlying title, to [Aboriginal] lands vested in the Crown” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075, Dickson C.J. and La Forest J. at 1103). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
Speaking of its decision to vacate the IRS Rule, the majority in Halbig stated “[w]e reach this conclusion, frankly, with reluctance. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]