Search for: "State v. South"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 10,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 7:31 pm
Also today, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Miller v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm
He was extradited from the Netherlands to the United States earlier this week. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:29 am
In Soto v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Cruz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:05 am
In Moss v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 6:11 pm
We attempted to file an amicus brief in Doe v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
Under State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 4:47 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled that it could not hear the appeal of American Isuzu Motors v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:20 am
Indeed, the facts of a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pettit v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
He also stated that the general rule that there is no duty to protect others from third party harm is not appropriate for members of a force whose duty it is to provide protection. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
To be sure, some of the States that deny the merits of South Africa’s case have their own good names to worry about, given the potential fallout from the lawsuit. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
The ambiguity here is from an extradition treaty with South Korea that says that if the statute of limitations in the receiving party for the crime has already expired, that party "may" refuse to extradite the requested person.So imagine, as here, that South Korea asks the U.S. to extradite someone for second degree murder, but the statute of limitations for this crime here -- five years -- has already expired. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 7:49 am
After all, conservatives also love to hate Miranda v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
In South Yuba River Citizens League v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:59 am
South Carolina Clean Air Initiative, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:03 am
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, No. 22-807. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
