Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:50 am
Edwards v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
A longer list of states now uses independent and mostly or entirely non-partisan boards or commissions to handle the task of shaping election districts for their state legislatures. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Respect for transgender peopleThe Supreme Court decided not to take up the school district’s appeal in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 12:37 pm
In Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
It is unnecessary, therefore, to go into the larger question "whether as a sequel to an adverse verdict in a domestic enquiry serious civil and pecuniary consequences are likely to ensue, in order to enable the person so likely to suffer such consequences with a view to giving him a reasonable opportunity to defend himself, on his request, should be permitted to appear through a legal practitioner" which was kept open in Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
It is unnecessary, therefore, to go into the larger question "whether as a sequel to an adverse verdict in a domestic enquiry serious civil and pecuniary consequences are likely to ensue, in order to enable the person so likely to suffer such consequences with a view to giving him a reasonable opportunity to defend himself, on his request, should be permitted to appear through a legal practitioner" which was kept open in Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
Code §7231, Raven’s Cove v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
Booth v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 7:27 pm
For instance, Steele v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:28 am
In an annex to a summons to oral proceedings the board set out its provisional opinion, expressing doubts as to whether the application complied with Article 123(2) EPC (added subject-matter), Article 84 EPC 1973 (clarity and conciseness) and Article 56 EPC 1973 (inventive step).V. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
Although there is as yet no sign of active defiance by officials in states where such marriages remained banned — that is, as of June 26, when the Court decided Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:49 am
Board of Education, which explore the acceptablity of "separate but equal" facilities for citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:21 am
The same is equally true of resort to arbitration. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Georgia Board of Equalization (06-1287), asking whether federal courts must accept the valuation method chosen by a state in determining a railroad's true market value. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:58 am
State of Calif, DMV (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
This case represents a subtle but real shift from current 8th Circuit law as stated in Fjellestad v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:51 am
The court made clear in Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
