Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 36,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
In other words, was it a matter of "common sense" to you? [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:46 am
Please ignore my previous words. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
I know, that's jury unanimity, but I think that whenever I see the word "gravamen. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
California State Lottery (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1198, 1203-1204; Janis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:23 pm
It is hard to escape the conclusion that the US Congress has entered the intellectual wilderness, a sad state of affairs in a country that has led the world in many scientific arenas for so long. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
But always, always, follow the rules. ___________ Booher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
In other words, the crimes remain state offenses, with state elements. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:11 am
Third, Steve asserts that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:53 pm
Yet entirely within the province of a state court, which has the final word on the contours of state law, including but not limited to standing under state law (which may be -- and is -- different than federal standing principles).So, in the end, an interesting opinion less because of who the defendant is and more for what the Court of Appeal actually holds. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Just a quick word on Astorga v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:29 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
Supreme Court The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the Secretary of State’s appeal. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The case that prompted the discussion was the Aarow Equipment & Services, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:31 pm
(Eugene Volokh) State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
