Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 7,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
Congress seeks to enforce them in United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
(For Exhibit A, see Burwell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
Whatever the history, the reality is that there are strong, well-financed forces favorable to business and to conservative political principles that exert powerful influence over state judicial elections. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:41 am
Giraldo v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:00 am
But no one who reads the cases on confirmation or vacatur of awards, at least in the United States, can think that parties are only repairing to the courts in exceptional cases. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:25 am
In Incantalupo v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
United States consular officials process millions of visa applications annually (see the State Department’s latest statistics here). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 3:56 pm
However, as Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Apple & Eve, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
In Farina v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
For instance, the district court gives the strong impression that then-White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki used the words “legal consequences” in purportedly threatening social media companies. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
” Maggs also casts doubt on Kaspersky’s claim that it is not an FSB unit, as indicated by public filings. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:48 am
(Via Hot Air.)In court, an attorney for [Americans United for Separation of Church and State] said state lawmakers had approved what she called a "uniquely Christian" license plate.... [read post]
