Search for: "TARGET CORPORATION v. US " Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
These are all potential private censors, and thus they are all potential targets of government control. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
At first blush, permitting investors to target directors personally, instead of a corporation, may not seem like a novel legal concept. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:57 am by David Cole
As long as the disfavored American corporation divested, the platform could carry all the same content and use the same algorithm. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm by Florian Mueller
., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Microsoft Corp.In the Matter of Microsoft Corp., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Activision Blizzard, Inc.Each complaint has three parts: introduction, item-by-item denials and admissions, and (partly affirmative) defenses. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
After Grutter, the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, Seventh and Eighth Circuits sustained Title VII challenges to race-conscious diversity programs used by the cities of Milwaukee, Newark, Shreveport, Chicago, and Omaha, as well as at least one major private employer, Xerox Corporation. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
The People) (Recording Industry vs The People) Viacom – YouTube should not be required to use software filters, Public Knowledge tells Court: Viacom v YouTube (Public Knowledge) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court N D Georgia: Trademark owner gets injunction against keyword ad campaign that generated no sales for the advertiser: InternetShopsInc.com v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
In doing so, it has followed another recent English case in Dhanani v. [read post]