Search for: "Tenant v. State" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm by Giles Peaker
In this situation the Code states that the Secretary of State considers it is unlikely to be reasonable for a tenant to occupy the property beyond the date in the s.21 notice (1 July 2014). [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
The late Sir Hugh Laddie famously became a bit fed up with having to deal with general Chancery Division business, like landlord and tenant matters, when he was the Patents Court judge. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:34 am by Lynsey Ellard
In the case of Levett-Dunn, the tenant served break notices on each of its four landlords at the address stated for the landlords in the lease. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Crosby v Birmingham City Council, Birmingham Civil Justice Centre, 8 March 2016 Ms C was an Introductory tenant of Birmingham. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:00 am by Katherine A. Campbell
The rent was supposed to rise to £1,200 a year if the tenant did not carry out the necessary repair works within one year. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:16 pm
The restrictions on the length of leases and the provision allowing the Residents to require the trustee to terminate any lease to a Tenant on giving a Tenant 30 days notice, prevent the trustee from attracting tenants and entering into long-term profitable leases. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
If you want a brief example of the court’s approach to these issues look no further than the case of Manchester City Council v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 11:18 pm by Tessa Shepperson
This came to light in a case called Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, where Mrs Nicholas (who was in the process of appealing a court order for possession) woke up one morning to find the Sheriffs officers actually in her house. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Ahmad v Newham [2009] PTSR 632 was not relevant where the issue was discrimination, rather than relative allocation of preference. [read post]