Search for: "US v. Stone" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 3:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to decide that issue in Stone Street Partners, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
I wouldn’t argue that specific-intentions originalism has never been used or that it’s inappropriate in all cases to use it. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  [Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm by Cody Poplin
However, in a presentation preceding Putin’s, Russia’s economic minister, Aleksei V. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm by Steve Vladeck
It’s not just Quirin that makes this position clear; it’s also Dynes v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Rick St. Hilaire
” Without the possibility of prosecution, federal attorneys decided to seek title to the objects through civil forfeiture with the intent to return the heritage objects to Peru.Prosecutors filed a civil action in Miami federal district court on May 10, 2013 to forfeit 29 objects consisting of a Moche bone carving (pictured here), a 12 piece Inca burial bundle, an Early Horizon/Chavin stone carving, and more. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am by Steve Baird
Tile & Stone, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 1366, 1372 (TTAB 2009). [read post]