Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Nathaniel Grow
United States, in which the Court famously stated "it is competition, not competitors, which the [Sherman] Act protects. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Spicy IP) ACTA text released: Impact on India and other developing countries (Spicy IP) Calcutta High Court: No stay on classic song in Housefull (Spicy IP) Spicy IP interview: KritiKal and innovation solutions for India (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel judge refuses to issue temporary injunction for patent infringement (The IP Factor)   Korea New developments in the KIPO (inovia’s Foreign Filing Blog)   Netherlands District Court of The Hague finds direct patent… [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
  The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by April Doss
There were clearly no Fourth Amendment concerns in the initial collection, as this was classic FAA 702 targeting of a non-U.S. person outside the United States, and there are no allegations of improper targeting, retention, dissemination, or other use of the target’s communications. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm by Reeve T. Bull
A final approach may entail handing back more regulatory power to the states and localities, creating a natural experiment of the type described by Justice Louis Brandeis in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm by Andrew J. Batog
”[6] As Henry Kissinger, a figure who stands as perhaps the chief opponent of universal jurisdiction in the United States, blithely asserted, “the notion that heads of state and senior public officials should have the same standing as outlaws (such as pirates) before the bar of justice is quite new. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
European and Community trade mark watchers will probably know that an appeal to the Court of Justice has been lodged in Case C-327/11 United States Polo Association v OHIM. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Ken White
United States, the leading case here in the Ninth Circuit applying it. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States The woman who claimed to be the victim of a brutal gang-rape portrayed in a now discredited Rolling Stone article will not testify in the defamation lawsuit facing the magazine. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
I had the good fortune of teaching the classic partnership case of Martin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am by Guest Author
 A privilege for everyone would mean a privilege for no one, because Congress would never pass an act that allows every single citizen in the United States to quash a subpoena. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
  Privacy Shield The Privacy Shield, like its invalidated predecessor “Safe Harbor,” is an agreement between the United States and the EU that affords companies in the U.S. a framework for compliance with EU data-protection requirements when transferring data from the EU to the U.S. [read post]