Search for: "United States v. Gay" Results 1221 - 1240 of 1,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Executive officers swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 5:25 am by SHG
It was only in 2003 that the United States Supreme Court struck a fatal blow to sodomy laws, in the landmark Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix from Great Seal of the United States, State Symbols USA) For American Independence Day I started considering the essence of American ideology. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
The Perry case is widely anticipated to end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Gender issues arise because immigrant communities may allow women, gay people, young people more power in the immigrant community than perhaps in the country of origin. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:56 pm
 Did you know that the landmark gay rights case Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
Lopez),  the Necessary and Proper Clause (United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am by Mark Murakami
Gay, 7 Haw. 587 (1889); Boundaries of Pulehunui, 4 Haw. 239 (1879); Koa v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:35 am by Race to the Bottom
’s - a United States financial services company that operates stock exchanges -  proposed rules regarding diversity on boards of directors were approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 6, 2021. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm by Christopher Wilkinson
  The DOJ’s brief was clear that Title VII does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination, and that “the EEOC is not speaking for the United States” and its position about the scope of Title VII is entitled to no deference. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:15 pm by Stephen Page
” Those who become parents through surrogacy, for example, gay couples, too often do not have access to breast milk. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Stopping the counting of votes and overruling democracy in Bush v. [read post]