Search for: "United States v. Harris"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 2,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
United States, a major Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
That critique reached a new peak in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
Second, while some states have made the legislative choice to disallow mandatory agency fees (as they are free to do), others have entered into longstanding union contracts that include agency fee provisions; as Justice Kagan observed in her dissent in Harris v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am
For instance, tariffs on components for products made in the United States may be eliminated, as well as products made by the China operations of US companies. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Solicitor General Daryl Joseffer for the United States as amicus. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
United States, 364 U.S. 206, 222 (1960). [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
See Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:22 am
There are many aspects of this litigation that merit brief mention up front.First, the question of how the state constitution or state supreme court might bind the state legislature in exercising its power as the "legislature" under the United States Constitution to regulate the "time, places, and manner" of elections. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
