Search for: "United States v. National Lead Co"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,788
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co., 79 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 1996); Wrighten v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Our bipartisan Working Group is comprised of leading academics, former Commission officials, and market participants who have studied and overseen development of SEC rules for decades, including: Fifteen former senior SEC officials, including four SEC Chairs, five SEC Commissioners, five SEC General Counsel, and four Directors of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance; Seventeen senior scholars of corporate, securities and administrative law, as well as accounting and finance, from… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed, leading the state to appeal to the Supreme Court, contending that such revenue-sharing arrangements are common in state-tribe compacts in a number of states, all with the approval of the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Human Rights Watch spoke to the co-founder of the intelligence software company that spotted the breach. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Selectica, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The taxpayer or the Appeals Officer can file a request for technical advice with the IRS National Office. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Kristine Huskey left Shearman & Sterling to become the co-director of the National Security Clinic at UT Law School. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Kentucky case, Kant v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
These consequences, moreover, are beyond the competence of any single state to address – and thus create precisely the sort of inescapably national problem that the Framers contemplated when they drafted a “Commerce Clause” to authorize the national government to regulate where the several states cannot. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
On June 20, 2011, the high court issued an 8-0 opinion (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused) in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I had not previously met Jeanne Sheehan Zaino or Wilfred Codrington (though I did happily blurb the book on constitutional amendment that Wilfred co-authored with John Kowal). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
