Search for: "United States v. State of Louisiana" Results 1221 - 1240 of 2,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Steven Boutwell
Because the accident occurred upon the navigable waterways of the United States, admiralty jurisdiction and general maritime law applied to this case. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:28 am by Ed Gehres
United States provides for tribal regulatory power over non-Indians when the party consents to tribal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-9409, Flowers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
” At Legal Aggregate, Gregory Ablavsky weighs in on last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-9409. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:56 am by Berniard Law Firm
A recent case from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal explains how pre-existing injuries can complicate claims for maintenance and cure. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
United States, which he characterizes as having “effectively legalized racial profiling of drivers by police. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]