Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
South Carolina Healthcare Providers: $140 Million Settlement In September, “[a] group of South Carolina healthcare providers, laboratories, and testing facilities all owned or managed by chiropractor Daniel McCollum” entered into a settlement in which they “will pay a total of $140 million to the U.S. government after failing to defend against charges of kickback schemes and unnecessary testing,” according to WNN. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:49 am
In one case, on July 31, 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction blocking the Title IX rule from going into effect in Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
District Court in South Carolina. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:20 pm
District Court for the District of South Carolina denied al-Marri's habeas petition in August 2006. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
United States v. 39 Cases, 192 F. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
” Four states – Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and South Carolina – next assert that they have standing because the program will reduce their tax revenues. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:59 pm
Based on a government document filed in a federal court in South Carolina at the end of April in a separate case filed by Al-Marri, his attorneys contended Wednesday that his designation as an enemy was “illegal because it was for the illegitimate purpose of interrogation” — a violation of the Supreme Court’s 2004 ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
See, The United States Department of Justice Manual §9-105.000. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:40 am
His firm has offices in North and South Carolina, and his Veterans practice is national. [1] Lendenmann v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Justice White concurring and dissenting in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am
In fact if you look in the South Carolina Code of Laws which mandates what a solicitor’s job is we can’t be like a normal attorney is. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
United States In the case of Hedine v. [read post]
