Search for: "Washington v. Texas"
Results 1221 - 1240
of 3,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
See Louisiana v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:22 pm
In 1974 the Washington Court of Appeals in Singer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:41 am
Kerr-McGee trial and went on to cover trials across the country from West Texas to the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] Amicus Brief in the Congressional Apportionment Case Currently Before the Supreme Court
20 Nov 2020, 11:29 am
Earlier this week, University of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson and I filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
University of Texas at Austin also continued yesterday. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:46 pm
More on Faretta v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
What about Texas and Illinois, which do require pre-suit notice? [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
The name of the case if Varnum v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
The name of the case if Varnum v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas, and Animal Science Products v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
I will be traveling to Washington to hear arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Texas, 21-6001Issues: (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:50 pm
., Washington, DC: "A Lost Opportunity to Protect Democracy Against Itself: What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in Trump v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:18 am
J2 Global Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
University. of Texas, [10] two white individuals were denied admission to the University of Texas at Austin (UT), and argued that they had been discriminated against based on their race. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Washington. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Washington v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” In The Washington Post, Richard Willing reports that “Chief Justice Earl Warren’s majority opinion” in Miranda v. [read post]
