Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court" Results 1221 - 1240 of 3,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
This time, the district court granted the motions. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:18 am by John Floyd
The appeals court ordered a federal district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus and command Johnson’s release from the Pennsylvania prison system. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:20 am by Prof. Estrin, Daniel E.
First, on October 3, 2011, the court considered federal court abstention in Raritan Baykeeper v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:17 pm by Richard Hunt
Of course these lower court decisions do not bind any other court; even other district courts: “A decision of a federal district court judge is not binding precedent in either a different judicial district, the same judicial district, or even upon the same judge in a different case. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am by David Post
But his request for release was denied, first by the federal district court and then by the 4th Circuit [opinion here]. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 10:45 am by Rich
Acker of the Northern District of Alabama, probably the lead singer in the Rising Judicial Chorus, had to say about remands in his recent decision in May v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
White (7th Circuit Court of Appeals) William White was charged with soliciting the commission of a violent federal crime against a juror in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:47 am
Marketing of “Original Formula” Classic Coke Was Not Unfair or DeceptiveThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Coca-Cola’s marketing of “Classic,” “Original Formula” Coke with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) substituted for sucrose was not an unfair practice under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, the federal district court in East St. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
The decision is Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
“Clinically Proven” Help-Baby-Sleep Labeling Could Be DeceptiveThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Johnson & Johnson’s labeling of its baby bath products as “clinically proven” to help babies sleep better could be deceptive and misleading in violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, but a purchaser’s allegations of ascertainable loss were inadequate to establish a cause of action, the federal… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 This Appellate Division decision reports that an attorney [Respondent] "pleaded guilty, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York to misprision of a felony* in violation of 18 USC §4. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 This Appellate Division decision reports that an attorney [Respondent] "pleaded guilty, in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York to misprision of a felony* in violation of 18 USC §4. [read post]