Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 6:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court recognized such an argument in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case from 2018, where they ruled that a state administrative agency ruled against an anti-gay baker because the agency demonstrated hostility toward religious beliefs. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Letters before action were then sent and undertakings by the first and second defendants were then given stating they would comply with the shareholders' agreement for 60 days. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:51 am by Amanda Pickens
January 20, 2016) (collective and class action under FLSA and state law alleging that defendant bakery operator improperly classified bakers as independent contractors and failed to pay overtime). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
It follows then that just as a state could not forbid bakers from baking cakes to celebrate same-sex wedding ceremonies, a state cannot force a baker to bake a cake in order to celebrate one. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Let’s take a look at some questionable trial practices, as found in the case of Baker v. [read post]