Search for: "BARNETT v. BARNETT" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett contend that Congress can only regulate the sale and transportation of goods across state lines, which furthers their libertarian vision.[19]Concededly, the core meaning of “commerce” has always been trade, but in 1787 its regulation also included market-oriented activities such as manufacturing, banking, and insurance.[20]The Constitution’s ratifiers shared that view, and early ICC legislation (approved by Presidents and the Court)… [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
And deciding Art 6 compliance requires a view to the composite decision-making process, including but not limited to the judicial review process (R (Alconbury Developments Limited) v SS for the Environment, Transport and Regions [2003] 2 AC 295, Runa Begum [2003] 2 AC 430 and Adan v Newham LBC [2002] 1 WLR 2120. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:10 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve heard quite a bit in the last few days about Doe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 6:47 am by Joe Patrice
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943) (emphasis omitted)). [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Sandy Levinson
To the contrary, I agree with the Court’s decision in Marsh v. [read post]