Search for: "Base Holdings, LLC" Results 1241 - 1260 of 9,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Nassiri Law
Despite holding this tight control over the workers, the company insisted they were independent contractors. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:05 am by Erik W. Weibust
  Then in 2016, BlueLinx Holdings Inc. agreed to pay a penalty to the SEC in connection with confidentiality language in its severance agreements. [read post]
The FDRLST Media decision provides employer protections against holding executives liable for personal expressions based solely on the speaker’s corporate associations or identity. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
Defendant-appellant FCA US LLC invoked the first sale doctrine as a defense to trademark claims asserted against it by plaintiff-appellee Bluetooth SIG Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by John Elwood
Neapco Holdings LLC, 20-891Issues: (1) What standard determines whether a patent claim is “directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Supreme Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
  Coca-Cola holds the trademark rights in India, but not in the USA. [read post]
  According to the Garante, the feature does not prevent Google LLC from re-identifying the user, given Google’s capabilities to enrich such data through additional information it holds, especially in circumstances where those users maintain and use a Google account. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The claim, including any cause of action for "fraud on the court," is barred by the doctrines of res judicata (see Rojas v Romanoff, 186 AD3d 103, 108 [1st Dept 2020]) and collateral estoppel (see Conason v Megan Holding, LLC, 25 NY3d 1, 17 [2015]) based on dismissal of the "identical parallel federal court action" and a prior order of this Court affirming the orders that claimant now essentially seeks review of (Moskovits v Bank of Am. [read post]