Search for: "Billings v. Illinois" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
City of Carbondale, Illinois, 24-57Issue: Whether this Court should overrule Hill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am by Mark Graber
Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, the prime mover of the Second Confiscation Act, maintained the bill was directed at “all rebels, and those who give them aid and comfort. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am by Marie Louise
(Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) (WIPO) Contralesa on RSA’s Traditional Knowledge Bill (Afro-IP)   Australia Does your patent portfolio need a health check? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Indiana to the idea that portions of the Bill of Rights would not be incorporated against the states (“Really? [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Kim Laube & Co (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Patent assignor estoppel is limited to the assignee: Schultz v. iGPS Co. [read post]
4 May 2018, 9:11 am by Richard Hunt
The amount finally awarded was more than $20,000 after a 20% discount from the amounts billed. [read post]