Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 9,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2022, 6:14 am
Melwani v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 2:39 am
However, some of the authorised dealers had unbundled the co-branded bags and sold them separately to unauthorised dealers, who in turn sold the co-branded backpacks to parallel importers, such as An Sheng Trading, who then tried to import them into Singapore. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Yen: consumers learn rapidly about store brand v. name brand. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:44 am
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
In Promatek v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
Recently, Givenchy has filed a lawsuit against BCBG Max Azria, (Givenchy S.A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
* Gordon v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
Ohio 2015); Shah v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:36 pm
Welcome back to the start of a brand-new week! [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:26 pm
The recent decision of Justice Perell in Dead End Survival, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:33 pm
The Court’s decision – Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:26 pm
The recent decision of Justice Perell in Dead End Survival, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:13 pm
Ziebarth v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:41 am
Federal Court:Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162Full Federal Court:Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 51S123 of the Trade Marks Act sets out that a person does not infringe a trade mark if the trade mark has been applied by or with the consent of the registered owner of the trade mark.Infringement takes place when the alleged infringing use is use as a trade mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:29 am
The Complainant in Hostess Brands, Inc. f/k/a Interstate Bakeries Corporation v. [read post]
