Search for: "Credible, Inc" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
While defendants benefitted from the misappropriation and infringement, RIME has been harmed by the misappropriation and infringement “including damage to Plaintiff’s reputation and credibility in the art world based upon the perceived association with and endorsement of the Moschino and Jeremy Scott brands“. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Documents created by entities of questionable credibility, produced second- or third-hand, and purportedly authenticated by witnesses who are unfamiliar with the lender’s online record creation and retention practices are insufficient. ___ Resorb Networks, Inc. v YouNow.com: This is an account termination case, vaguely along the lines of the YouTube cases Eric has blogged about. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, determining whether the servers were “active, voluntary participants” in the restaurant’s failure to pay them minimum wages and overtime compensation would require a jury to resolve a credibility dispute. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:05 pm by Attorney Theodore Ronca
 medsearch7@optonline.net   ©2016 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Privacy Shield https://t.co/wEMHYN9pBr -> PM Lee urges US to ratify TPP, or lose credibility https://t.co/BBEioNengs -> Protectionism sucks | Canada Free Press https://t.co/xFPwB1ankS -> U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:03 am by Steven Koprince
AMEL Technologies, Inc., a woman-owned business, submitted a bid. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Neumann Law Group
Defendant Honeywell International Inc. appealed, contending that this opinion testimony—commonly referred to as the “every exposure” theory—should have been excluded pursuant to Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Neumann Law Group
Defendant Honeywell International Inc. appealed, contending that this opinion testimony—commonly referred to as the “every exposure” theory—should have been excluded pursuant to Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]