Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
I shall call her X. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
I hate clutter. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
I wrote about the study here. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:53 am
Because I was a law clerk (nearly fifty years ago) I personally don’t see anything wrong with the way the justices choose to run their offices – which is to say, how much input they have on the opinions that emerge from their chambers with the heading, “Justice X, concurring. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:58 am
” The draft TS also provides five suggested forms of nano-disclosure for use in the existing ingredient section of product labels: “a manufactured nanoscale form of X;” “0.1 g of nanoscale X;” “X, approximately size range P nm - Q nm, specific surface area R m2 g-1;” “a dispersion of manufactured nanoscale X in Y;” and/or “[nanoscale shape of] X, with an aspect ratio of 1:20. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
All these factor into whether you should vote to certify.So, in the end, I think that Judge Bybee has to do a little bit more here than he does to justify his vote. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:59 pm
[18] I do not think such a passive approach was sufficient. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
X-Posted: Concurring Opinions. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:37 pm
The but-for test is a procedure - a test - used to determine the validity of a conclusion, arrived at by some method that does not use "but-for", that X could be, and in the particular case probably is, a cause of Y. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Felons can’t lawfully possess guns — does it mean they can’t even arrange for their sale, and that the court may just order them destroyed? [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am
Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1879)).That is why I wrote in the title that I hope for the death of copyright. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:44 pm
Some people get confused by the term “regular rate” and mistake it as a synonym for what I call the “base rate”. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:54 pm
This system does not take into account when the victim becomes aware of the malpractice. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:43 am
I hope to hear from you. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:13 am
I hope to hear from you. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:47 pm
This position has been supported by the Children's Guardian although he does not agree to X being named. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:54 pm
This system does not take into account when the victim becomes aware of the malpractice. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
I was reminded of this general point by SCOTUSBlog’s Argument Preview of Greene v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
” If a taxpayer accepts the government offer and does x, is the government contractually bound to provide the enacted tax break? [read post]
16 May 2023, 10:58 am
Wentong Zheng and I have recently discussed this issue in an article. [read post]
