Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
The English version follows.Reviews Jade WhiteThe following commentaries are responses to A Looming Crisis for China’s Legal System, by Jerome A. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
He is a research associate at the CCP Research Foundation and also works as international counsel in an English law firm. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:48 am
The post <i>Soriano v Forensic News</i> – Can a US corporation with no EU operations be caught by the GDPR? [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:59 am
”); Tsarbopoulos v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Evergreen Association, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
The case is State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
Historically, the English courts have policed the parameters of the “same interest” test strictly: Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:04 am
State (Maryland). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Oppo Daily Special In Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23, the Court considered whether implementers found to infringe a UK patent must commit to take an English Court set (as opposed to some other jurisdiction) FRAND licence. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:22 am
V. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:14 pm
Defendant struck Alvarez in the jaw although Alvarez, who did not speak English, had not exchanged any words with him. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:42 am
Whether domain name registrants are cybersquatting on the trademark depends on a number of factors that are discussed in Imagine Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
Stage 1: Entitled Expectation Lord Tyre considered the leading authorities on the issue of “defect” under the CPA, namely Wilkes v DePuy International Limited [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB) and Gee and Ors v DePuy International Limited [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Youming Jin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
