Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 7:22 pm
Applying Pennsylvania’s Frye standard, Judge Moss upheld Proctor & Gambles challenge to Dr. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:11 am
Thomas, who is representing himself, cited a 1987 Georgia Supreme Court case known as Cherry v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:06 pm
Miscellaneous * Asch Webhosting, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 pm
Eye on the Booty; V. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
In that new decision, in the case of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:05 am
An Israeli court asserted jurisdiction over Carlton, a foreign citizen, and stated that as long as a portion of the illegal activity (here, gambling) occurred in Israel, there is no need for universal jurisdiction, and the website operator is subjected to the Israeli law (State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:12 am
The Court of First Instance of the European Communities handed down its judgment in Joined Cases T-241/05, T-262/05 to T-264/05, T-346/05, T-347/05, T-29/06 to T-31/06 Procter & Gamble Company v Officefor Harmonisation in the Internal Market on Wednesday 23 May 2007. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:22 pm
Background In Gamble v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
Silverstein v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:27 am
Business Services Co. et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:27 pm
v=MR0ZXvLg7YY&feature=player_embedded www.gmodules.com="" ig="" ifr? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:06 pm
[1] Snyder v Walsh, 2013 N.Y. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
Gamble, 56 N.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:14 pm
Gamble, 56 N.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
NCAA, in which the New Jersey governor is asking the Court to review a federal law that prohibits most states, including New Jersey, from licensing or authorizing sports gambling. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:14 am
In 1987, in McNally v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Chuang v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Image credits: Sleepwalking - GIPHYAmsterdam - Shovy Rahman PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial designs | Decoding the Scope of Patent Protection: Singapore after Eli Lilly v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
The provision at issue appears likely to discard these beneficial aspects of targeted information along with harmful content such as smoking, gambling, alcohol, or extreme weight loss. [read post]
