Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 1241 - 1260 of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 7:44 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Even with a valid out-of-state marriage license, gay and lesbian couples in those states face uncertainty, extra legal bills and inevitable rebuffs that straight couples avoid ... [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:24 pm
Hurst, a pro se lawsuit in Lousiana in which a same-sex couple claims that the state constitutional ban on gay marrige violates due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am by Nelson Tebbe
It is why the line of cases coming out of Sherbert v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Mark Walsh
Bonauto of Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders is here again today, as is James D. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Nabiha Syed
Monday’s coverage of the Court continues to focus on Perry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
Claims for damages against the state are barred by the 11th Amendment. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
According to yesterday's Denver Post, the Colorado Supreme Court has denied review in the widely watched case of  Craig v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:16 pm by Mark Movsesian
[Last week's argument at the Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:11 pm
Says Monica Potts in The American Prospect (a liberal publication): [The lawsuit is based on Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:26 am
" More significantly, as the Virginia courts had ruled in the Martin case, the state's sex crimes laws remained enforceable to the fullest extent consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]