Search for: "German v. German" Results 1241 - 1260 of 5,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2020, 6:21 pm
The current issue of the German Law Journal (Vol. 21, Special Issue No. 3, April 2020) focuses on "Border Justice: Migration and Accountability for Human Rights Violation. [read post]
Indeed, the lack of unambiguous clarification of precisely this point was invoked by the German Federal Patent Court as justification for maintaining its referral in the Royalty Pharma case even after the issuance of the CJEU’s judgment in Teva v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:19 am by Florian Mueller
Daimler brought its EU antitrust complaint against Nokia in 2018, and the Euporean Commission is still dragging its feet while another court decision (Nokia v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We had spent much of the term, both in and out of class, discussing the legal questions involved in the case that came to be known as Bush v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:22 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The referral from the German Federal Court of Justice concerns the interpretation of Art. 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive and whether the term ‘address’ shall include email and IP address. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:58 am by INFORRM
It tried a similar approach in Canada in what is by now quite a well-known case, Google v Equustek. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The individual had sought to have his name removed from the articles published by a German magazine and the articles themselves removed from general internet search results of his name. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
, says Merpel], that referral remains a very important one for several reasons.Going back to C-264/19, let’s see how AG Øe reasoned, and what the implications of his Opinion might be.BackgroundThere is not much to add re the background to this case beyond what is stated above: the dispute between film producer Constantin Film [a company that has been party to some topical recent CJEU cases, including: the referral concerning availability of blocking injunctions under EU copyright… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am by Barry Sookman
German researchers are planning to introduce “immunity certificates” which theoretically could be used to identify some of these individuals. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am by Karlee
German researchers are planning to introduce “immunity certificates” which theoretically could be used to identify some of these individuals. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:45 am by Barry Sookman
German researchers are planning to introduce “immunity certificates” which theoretically could be used to identify some of these individuals. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Following the AG's decision, the CJEU has finally considered the question of offensive trademarks and handed down their judgment earlier this year.The case of Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v EUIPO concerned an application to register the name "Fack Ju Göhte" (EUTM 13971163), which is the name of a German comedy film produced by Constantin. [read post]