Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 1241 - 1260 of 2,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2012, 7:21 am by Rachel Sachs
United States, and Filarsky v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm by WIMS
It read the provision to mean that ethanol plants fired with natural gas and/or biomass that commenced construction in 2008 or 2009 ('qualifying ethanol plants') are deemed compliant with the 20 percent greenhouse gas reduction requirement 'indefinitely.' . . [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
Circuit also dismissed a petition for review in National Chicken Council v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:33 pm by Barry Barnett
Linda Greenhouse, "The Mystery of John Roberts", The New York Times, July 11, 2012. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:36 am by Ann Carlson
EPA and Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Cormac Early
In the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am by nflatow
Supreme Court ruled, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:07 am by jschachter
" This importance of the issues in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm by Joe Koncelik
  Here is a brief re-cap of EPA's actions: Endangerment Finding- before regulating greenhouse gases (GHGs) from motor vehicles, the Supreme Court told EPA in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:26 am by Lisa Peters
  Commentary about the decision Greenhouse Gas Regs Upheld: Coalition for Responsible Reg. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Reg. 17,004 (Apr. 2, 2010) (“Timing Rule”), and its Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, 75 Fed. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Reg. 17,004 (Apr. 2, 2010) (“Timing Rule”), and its Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, 75 Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by admin
—A federal appeals court June 26 dismissed all challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s greenhouse gas regulations in an unsigned opinion that reaffirmed the rules in their entirety (Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]