Search for: "Hong v. Hong" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, Section 1210.02, Fourth Edition (April 2005); citing Institut National des Appellations D'Origine v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:06 pm
Every major news outlet and countless bloggers have now weighed in on the Supreme Court's opinion yesterday in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:33 pm
The article starts out talking about how in the old days, all one "needed to travel in and out of China for business was a tourist visa," which enabled you to "live and run businesses in China for decades" by shuttling "back and forth to Hong Kong...every six months or so.... [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
., Hong Kong.Here in Los Angeles, mediators deal with cross-cultural negotiation issues every day of the week. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:05 pm
The Times (UK) asks today, "Slaughter & May v Clifford Chance:  Who is pursuing the best route? [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:21 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeCourt Consolidates Actions Against New Jersey Firm By Allegedly Alter Ego Hong Kong Umbrella ExportersEverglory Company Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:11 am
The problem occured when the fake information was mistakenly communicated to one of the root nameservers hosted in Hong-Kong, and once there it was replicated to all of the other nameservers.Depending on how often your ISP updates its tables, you would not have had access to YouTube for a period of time on Friday. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
In the case of G2000 v. 2000, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court showed Chinese Trademark Law is still more interesting than the Leifeng Pagoda in Hangzhou, and the Hong Kong star sex scandal. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:35 am
A very important negative is that Dominican citizens are subject to many restrictions when travelling.5) As explained in Afroyim v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 8:00 pm
BackgroundA significant decision in the area of securities laws was handed two days ago by the US Supreme Court in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]