Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 37,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
The following month, the Court quietly dismissed In re Grand Jury as improvidently granted. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:11 pm
The district court granted the county’s motion to dismiss and concluded that Adam Bros. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
In a fairly straightforward case, the Northern District of Illinois granted Declaratory Judgment under 28 USC 2201(a) to plaintiff Amerimax Real Estate Partners in a trademark dispute with Re/Max International, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:54 pm
When they’re released, Griffin first takes the women shopping, “cause all they have is hooker clothes,” she said. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:09 am
For the reasons discussed above, the bankruptcy court's Order granting Pachulski's motion for summary judgment is reversed. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 10:06 am
The Court also dismissed with prejudice (no chance to re-plead) plaintiffs’ claims based on the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm
The post Late May Wrap-up: Another First Opinion, Another En Banc, Another Cert Grant appeared first on Sixth Circuit Appellate Blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
James Gildea issued Order No. 40 granting-in-part Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Observing that "that the class setting of the order greatly complicates the required legal analysis," the Court first explained that the motion was not brought, or granted, on the basis that all of the elements of res judicata had been, or could be, either proven or disproven classwide. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 11:54 pm
In re BDC 56 LLC, 330 F.3d 111, 118 (2d Cir.2003). . . . [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 8:04 am
This just in: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the case In re Bilski, on appeal from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
The court noted that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur would not apply. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:45 pm
”As an update it is noted that the Pennsylvania Superior Court has withdrawned this decision in favor of a re-argument en banc on the issues presented. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
The FDA’s “grant” is more like a “dodge. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
FERRIS, M.D., CHRISTINE DUNCAN, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, No. 14-0122 Opinion of the Court IN RE LONGVIEW ENERGY COMPANY AND IN RE HUFF ENERGY FUND, L.P., AND RILEY-HUFF ENERGY GROUP, LLC, No. 14-0175 Opinion of the Court LIFE PARTNERS HOLDINGS, INC., LIFE PARTNERS, INC., BRIAN D. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:19 pm
A movie on HBO called 8MM is on.Joaquin Phoenix to Nicholas Cage:“You’re not a cop, are you? [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
On Tuesday, June 2, 2009, a petition for rehearing was filed in In re Tobacco Cases II, no. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 4:31 am
In re Electronic Database Litigation, 509 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2007) cert. granted March 2, 2009.Does 17 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:37 am
Otherwise, if a single petition had challenged all claims, the PTAB might have granted a review theoretically because of a single claim being reasonably likely to be invalidated. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 10:14 am
In re Aqua: Amending Claims Post Grant in an IPR In re Aqua: Ambiguity in the Statute Means Deference to the PTO In re Aqua Products Lifting the Bar: Federal Circuit finds that the PTAB improperly allowed Amendments during IPR En Banc Query: Must the PTO Allow Amendments in IPR Proceedings? [read post]
