Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:54 am
A Moscow city court ruled on April 7th that YouTube was violating Russian copyright law by hosting copies of “Chernobyl” and “Fizruk. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Just shy of 50 years before Obergefell, the Supreme Court held that interracial couples have the same fundamental right to marry in Loving v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
(740 ILCS 50/2 rep.) [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The rule defines an eligible “closely held for-profit entity” as one that is not publicly traded; that has an ownership structure under which more than 50 percent of the organization’s ownership interest is owned by five or fewer individuals; and that objects to providing contraceptive coverage based on its owners’ religious beliefs. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:35 pm
The agency’s press release also states that since its 2011 inception, the whistleblower program has paid more than $50 million to 18 whistleblowers. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
But policing this conduct is exceedingly difficult for the simple reason that “Brady violations … almost always defy detection. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:54 am
We’re going to make sure they adhere to the rules and regulations and offer a safe establishment for people to enjoy. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:47 pm
According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, allergies are a major cause of illness in the United States, affecting as many as 50 million people, or one in five Americans. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
It is a violation of Article 21 [right to personal liberty],” The New Indian Express has an article about the decision entitled “Is Watching Porn a fundamental right? [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
Often you’re not the least bit interested in what they’re selling and you’re going through the motions. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:01 am
T-1064-13, T-393-14 (s. 8 damages/infringement/validity action Re: latanoprost for glaucoma). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The Proposed Rule declared no final FDA position on the safety and effectiveness of products with SPF values over 50. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:36 am
Ann Liniger offered some advice in an email to colleagues, recommending they know the value of the quantity of marijuana they are offered so as not to violate the $50 limit on gifts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm
The rule is 10 days in federal court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
3D printing presents all kinds of fascinating scenarios, but they’re not in this article.Take another example. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
In false advertising we should worry more: if there’s a truthful message received by 50%, we might not want to suppress it if suppression reduces confusion to 5% but also reduces comprehension of the truthful message to 5%. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:16 am
In 1878, the Court ruled in Wilkerson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:57 am
The use of this feed anywhere else violates copyright. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
After all, the ACA specifically defines “State” as “each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia. [read post]
