Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1241 - 1260
of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
I’m sure most of us remember the wrong-way driver who killed five teenagers speeding the wrong way on the interstate, stole a police cruiser, again drove the wrong way on the interstate and slammed into the wreckage he’d caused at 100 miles an hour, injuring several more people. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:06 am
Article 8 provides the right to respect for private and family life; b) Future disclosures were unlawful for the same reasons; c) The proposed regime relating to H and L’s personal assistants was unlawful; d) Making direct payments to the personal assistants was unlawful and ultra vires (meaning outside the powers of the authority). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:21 pm
Code § 63-9-780(C)[ii] gave it blanket protection in civil discovery against having to disclose anything in its files concerning an adopted child. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:33 pm
An interpretation whereupon the requirements of the jurisdiction can be fulfilled after pendancy and which orientates to the best interests of the child remains for an amendment of the regulation. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am
Three of the most common are those involving the loss table (§2B1.1(b)(1)), the victims table (§2B1.1(b)(2)), and the sophisticated means enhancement (§2B1.1(b)(10)). 1. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:22 am
Otherwise, if a parent says they are willing or able to accommodate the child, the local authority cannot accommodate the child against the parents’ wishes. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said, the Sergeant charged the Defendant with a violation of New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law §1180(d). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
D/B/A AT&T TEXAS v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
(d) Other issue. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
GREGORY FURNELL, an individual, DARLENE BRADEN, an individual, and JAMIE JOHNSTON, n/k/a JAMIE TANNER, an individual, Respondents. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- No error in denying father's emergency verified motion to compel mother to return parties' minor children to Florida -- Trial court correctly found that Florida's relocation statute did not apply where mother moved to foreign state before father filed for dissolution of marriageBENJAMIN… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Arkansas where (a) the prosecution advises a trial court that the appointment of a particular lawyer in a capital case to represent multiple defendants may create a conflict of interest; (b) the appointed lawyer informs the court that he is financially unable to appoint capitally certified counsel for each of the co-defendants; (c) the court acknowledges these conflicts of interest, but delegates resolution of them to the same lawyer; (d) the conflicted attorney… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
D. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:05 am
Code § 2252(a)(4)(B). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:38 am
S 3753-A BLURB : Exec. ban gender idnty discrimntnLast Act: 02/25/08 amend and recommit to governmental operations02/25/08 print number 6584aS675B
RATH -- Nixzmary's law; establishes the class A-I felony of aggravated murder of a child and the class B felony of aggravated manslaughter of a child; repealer No Same as BLURB : Pen L. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:13 am
Q: the child has the info too? [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:59 am
” (Art. 49(1)(d)) The European Regulators pointed out that the “public interest” needs to be an interest recognized in E.U. law or Member State law—not a third country. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:35 am
They are not investment bankers dispassionately considering an IPO, nor are they career criminals facing another eight months for yet another B&E. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
Rethink (a) substance of what we protect and (b) how we go about protecting it, use new media, interact with customers/public. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
(Withdrawn when D correctly filed a motion for sanctions.) [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Nonetheless, a majority found that: “The liberty interest at issue in this case–the interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children–is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this Court. [read post]
