Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 1241 - 1260 of 9,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2017, 3:28 am
In re GoldenDoodle LLC, Serial No. 86717500 (August 11, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas).The evidence submitted by Examining Attorney Tracy Whittaker-Brown established that the goods offered in applicant's retail stores may feature goods with images, slogans or information regarding the goldendoodle breed. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 4:00 pm by Rainey Reitman
In December, a federal judge even found the surveillance likely unconstitutional, calling it "almost-Orwellian." [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The motion was denied by the trial judge and oral arguments on the appeal were heard by the United States District Court for the District of Colombia last month. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:04 am
Borrowed from the women’s legal movement, the nonconformity framing was designed in the early 2000s and solidified during the Obama era to empower judges and bureaucrats at the federal Office for Civil Rights to bypass rulemaking procedures and force schools, on penalty of violating Title IX, to defer to their students’ gender self-identification. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 10:56 am by Unknown
Some of my commentaries about these episodes include Judge Judy and Tax Law, Judge Judy and Tax Law Part II, TV Judge Gets Tax Observation Correct, The (Tax) Fraud Epidemic, Tax Re-Visits Judge Judy, Foolish Tax Filing Decisions Disclosed to Judge Judy, So Does Anyone Pay Taxes? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:03 am by David Post
 I had read the opinion years ago, but re-encountered it for a class several weeks ago, and noticed the really unusual way Judge Newman uses the term “Internet. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
(We're pretty firmly convinced that that's the law, but it's always nice to hear yet another federal trial judge say so.)3. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:30 am by SHG
  They are designed to be grand, to reflect the majesty of the law and the authority of the courts. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
  If you're the judge, assuming all of the above is true, what's the disposition? [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
So, you’re pregnant, and you are scheduled to give birth during the next trial setting. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm by David Oscar Markus
And like I said, prisons are not designed with rehabilitation in mind. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
The podcast eventually expanded beyond the judiciary to include legal tech founders, legal design innovators, and others who are making an impact in the legal world. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In a stunning display of judicial activism, two conservative judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia re-wrote several recent Department of Defense regulations, a sixty-year-old Act of Congress, a basic principle of federalism upheld by dozens of Supreme Court opinions, and millenia of common law to dismiss the Saleh v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:07 am
  You're entitled to spend as much money on lawyers as you'd like.And we'll happily take your business, thank you very much. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:31 am by Dan Ernst
[We’re grateful to Professor Sarah Barringer Gordon, University of Pennsylvania, for the report of the Katherine Preyer Prize Panel which occurred on October 29, 2016, at the annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History in Toronto.]The annual Katherine Preyer panel at the ASLH is designed to recognize and promote excellent scholarship by early career scholars in legal history, honoring the generosity and acumen of the late Kitty Preyer. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:47 am by Mack Sperling
Be aware that a dismissal with prejudice is equivalent to a disposition on the merits, and it has res judicata effect. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:12 am
We’re with the likes of the Yemen and North Korea and Iran. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
”  This is the judge-made principle that allows you to use another person's trademark so long as you're not trying to mislead anyone. [read post]